Our Verdict
LG PuriCare 360 Wins

Boasting a superior 274.56 CADR for smoke versus PuroAir's 0.0, and slightly larger 429 sq ft coverage. Choose PuroAir if budget is the absolute priority and smoke removal is not a primary concern.
Bottom Line: LG PuriCare 360 is the better choice. Boasting a superior 274.
Key Differences
The most significant spec differences at a glance
Cadr Smoke
100% moreCoverage Sq Ft
3% moreAdvantages
Where each product wins
LG
- Cadr Smoke: 100% higher (274.56 vs 0.0)
- Coverage Sq Ft: 3% higher (429.0 vs 416.67)
Who Should Buy Which?
Find the right product for your needs
Buy LG if...
LG PuriCare 360 Air
The ideal buyer for the LG PuriCare 360 is someone who prioritizes comprehensive air quality monitoring and superior smoke removal. If you need robust filtration for ultrafine particles and odors, value smart home integration via WiFi, and want real-time air quality feedback from a PM 1.0 sensor, this is your choice. It's perfect for larger rooms up to 429 sq ft where precise air quality control and advanced technology are paramount, even if it means a slightly higher investment.
Buy PuroAir if...
PuroAir 400 HEPA Air
Ideal for the cost-conscious individual seeking reliable general air purification without needing advanced smart features or specific high-performance smoke removal. If you prioritize a quiet operation with a dedicated sleep mode and certified safety (CARB, ETL), and mainly need to tackle dust, pollen, and pet dander in rooms up to 416.67 sq ft, the PuroAir 400 is an excellent, budget-friendly choice. It's for those who want clear air but aren't dealing with significant smoke issues and prefer simplicity over connectivity.
Spec Comparison
5 specs compared
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $299 | $280 |
| Rating | 4.6(223) | 4.5(16.4k) |
| Cadr Smoke | 274.56 | 0 |
| Coverage Sq Ft | 429 | 416.67 |
| Filter Type | NanoFiber True HEPA | HEPA |
| Smart Sensor | Yes | Yes |
| WiFi | Yes | — |
Swipe horizontally to see all columns
Pros & Cons
Quick overview of strengths and weaknesses
LG PuriCare 360
- Captures 99.97% of 0.3µm particles with HEPA filter.
- Three-layer system includes activated carbon for odors.
- PM 1.0 sensor detects ultrafine particle levels.
- Covers 429 sq ft at 4.8 air changes per hour.
- Omnidirectional design limits placement options.
- Provides only 1 air change per hour in 2059 sq ft rooms.
- Multiple filters necessitate distinct replacements.
PuroAir 400 HEPA
- 3-layer filtration system removes 99.9% of pollutants
- Filters dust, pollen, pet dander, smoke, and VOCs
- Smart sensor monitors air and adjusts fan speed
- Quiet operation with dedicated sleep mode
- Smoke CADR listed as 0.0, despite filtration claims
- Effective coverage 416 sq ft, not advertised 2000 sq ft
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about this comparison
Which air purifier is better for smoke removal?
The LG PuriCare 360 is significantly better for smoke, with a CADR of 274.56. The PuroAir 400 lists a smoke CADR of 0.0, indicating it's not effective for smoke despite general filtration claims.
What is the main difference in room coverage?
Both offer comparable effective coverage: LG PuriCare 360 covers 429 sq ft, and PuroAir 400 covers 416.67 sq ft. Be aware of PuroAir's advertised 2,000 sq ft, as the effective coverage is much lower.
Is the price difference worth it for the LG PuriCare 360?
Yes, if you prioritize comprehensive smoke removal (CADR 274.56 vs 0.0), advanced smart features like WiFi and a PM 1.0 sensor, and NanoFiber True HEPA filtration, the LG's slightly higher price of $299 is justified.
Which product has better smart features?
The LG PuriCare 360 has superior smart features, including WiFi for remote control and a PM 1.0 sensor for detecting ultrafine particles. The PuroAir 400 has a smart sensor to adjust fan speed but lacks WiFi connectivity.
Explore Other Categories
Popular comparisons across the site
Ask AI
Get instant answers about specs
Get the Deets
Ask our AI assistant
Ask Deets anything!


























