Name: Dyson Purifier Cool™ Autoreact TP7A
Brand: Dyson
SKU: B0B5M3B8KP
Price: 399 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.4 (170 reviews)

Our Verdict

It's a Tie

Both Dyson purifiers report 0 for CADR smoke and coverage_sq_ft, making neither superior in these key areas. Choose HP1 for heating, cooling, and Wi-Fi app control. TP7A is suitable if you only need cooling and automatic purification without heating functionality.

Dyson

$399Buy on Amazon

Dyson

$545Buy on Amazon

Bottom Line: Both products are excellent choices. Both Dyson purifiers report 0 for CADR smoke and coverage_sq_ft, making neither superior in these key areas.

Who Should Buy Which?

Find the right product for your needs

Buy Dyson if...

Dyson Purifier Cool™ Autoreact

The ideal buyer for the Dyson Purifier Cool Autoreact TP7A is someone primarily seeking efficient air purification combined with cooling airflow, particularly in a single season. They prioritize automatic operation, thanks to its integrated air quality sensor, and appreciate the flexibility of direct or diffused airflow. This buyer is budget-conscious, finding the $399 price point appealing for Dyson quality, and doesn't require heating functionality or advanced smart home integration like Wi-Fi control, making it perfect for focused cooling and air quality needs.

Buy Dyson if...

Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool HP1

The Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool HP1 is perfect for those seeking a premium, multi-functional device that handles both air purification and climate control year-round. This buyer values the convenience of heating, cooling, and air purification in one unit, along with advanced smart features like Wi-Fi connectivity and remote control via app or voice commands. They are willing to invest $544.99 for comprehensive particle capture (99.97% >0.3 microns) and flexibility, appreciating the 350-degree oscillation for wider air distribution in various room settings, without needing additional heating or cooling appliances.

Spec Comparison

6 specs compared

Specification	Dyson Purifier Cool™ Autoreact	Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool HP1
Price	$399	$545
Rating	4.4(170)	4.4(157)
Cadr Smoke	0	0
Coverage Sq Ft	0	0
Smart Sensor	Yes	Yes
Filter Type	—	HEPA H13
Model Number	—	HP11
WiFi	—	Yes

Swipe horizontally to see all columns

Pros & Cons

Quick overview of strengths and weaknesses

Dyson Purifier Cool™

Pros

Automatic air purification
Provides cooling airflow
360-degree filtration system
User selects direct or diffused airflow

Cons

Zero CADR rating for smoke
No specified room coverage area

Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool

Pros

Captures 99.97% particles >0.3 microns.
Removes gases and 97% of household odors.
Functions as both a heater and a cooler.
Remote control via app or voice commands.

Cons

Lacks a clear CADR rating specification.
Requires periodic filter replacement.
Full functionality depends on app or voice control.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this comparison

Which Dyson purifier offers both heating and cooling functions?

The Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool HP1 provides both heating and cooling, making it versatile for year-round comfort. The Dyson Purifier Cool Autoreact TP7A only offers cooling airflow and purification, primarily for warmer conditions or ventilation.

How do their CADR smoke ratings compare?

Both the TP7A and HP1 have a CADR smoke rating of 0. This indicates neither product provides a certified clean air delivery rate for smoke particles. No specific coverage area is listed for either, making direct comparison on these priority specs difficult.

Which model provides more advanced control options?

The HP1 is Wi-Fi enabled, allowing remote control via an app or voice commands, offering more versatile management. The TP7A features automatic air purification and direct/diffused airflow selection but lacks specified Wi-Fi connectivity for app control.

Is the HP1's multi-functionality worth a potential higher price?

Yes, if you need a single device that can provide heating, cooling, and air purification throughout the year. If your primary need is only air purification with cooling, the TP7A might be a more focused and potentially cost-effective option.