Our Verdict
Shark UR2360S Wins

It provides a robust 3000 Pa suction power, which is explicitly quantified, at a significantly lower price point of $163.21. Its bagless 30-day self-empty base and self-cleaning brushroll offer strong vacuuming utility and lower running costs compared to the Roomba's bagged system. The iRobot Roomba 104 Combo is the superior pick for users who require a dedicated mopping function and extended 75-day self-emptying, justifying its higher $249.99 price for this dual-functionality and longer hands-off period.
Bottom Line: Shark UR2360S is the better choice. It provides a robust 3000 Pa suction power, which is explicitly quantified, at a significantly lower price point of $163.
In-Depth Analysis
How they compare in practice
The Shark UR2360S and iRobot Roomba 104 Combo both leverage LiDAR navigation for precise mapping, offering efficient cleaning paths regardless of floor plan complexity. However, their core utility diverges significantly. The Shark robot is a dedicated vacuum, boasting a clear 3000 Pa suction power. This concrete specification assures users of its capability for deep cleaning on both hard floors and carpets, especially beneficial for pet owners due to its self-cleaning brushroll that actively prevents hair tangles. Being a renewed item at $163.21, it offers exceptional value for a high-performance vacuum, including obstacle avoidance for a hassle-free clean.
In contrast, the iRobot Roomba 104 Combo is a 2-in-1 device, offering both vacuuming and mopping capabilities. While its suction power is described qualitatively as "70X power-lifting suction" rather than a specific Pa rating, its unique selling proposition lies in its versatility. It can vacuum all floor types and then seamlessly transition to mopping hard floors, automatically detecting and avoiding carpets during mopping cycles. This dual functionality comes at a higher price of $249.99, but provides a comprehensive floor cleaning solution for diverse environments.
The self-emptying mechanisms also present a key trade-off. The Shark features a bagless base with a 30-day capacity, which eliminates the ongoing cost and hassle of purchasing replacement bags. While the collected debris still needs to be handled upon disposal, it's a cost-effective system. The Roomba, on the other hand, extends self-emptying convenience to an impressive 75 days, drastically reducing interaction frequency. However, this convenience is tied to a bagged system, meaning recurrent expenses for proprietary dust bags and the environmental impact of their disposal.
For real-world use, a Shark owner will appreciate its straightforward, powerful vacuuming and the long-term savings from its bagless design, getting a powerful, albeit renewed, workhorse. A Roomba owner, however, invests in a more integrated, hands-off cleaning routine, sacrificing some upfront cost and ongoing bag expenses for the luxury of having both vacuuming and mopping performed by a single, intelligent robot that requires less frequent maintenance. The choice boils down to prioritizing raw vacuum power and budget efficiency versus comprehensive, low-touch floor care.
Key Differences
The most significant spec differences at a glance
Suction Power
100% moreAdvantages
Where each product wins
Shark
- Suction Power: 100% higher (3000 vs 0)
Which to Pick for Your Situation
Concrete scenarios with a clear recommendation
For homes with significant pet hair challenges
SharkThe Shark UR2360S offers 3000 Pa suction power and a self-cleaning brushroll, specifically designed to handle pet hair without tangles.
For mixed floor homes needing both vacuuming and mopping
iRobotThe iRobot Roomba 104 Combo provides a dedicated mopping function for hard floors alongside vacuuming, with smart carpet detection.
For budget-conscious buyers seeking strong vacuum performance
SharkPriced at $163.21, the renewed Shark UR2360S offers robust 3000 Pa suction and a bagless self-empty base at a significantly lower cost.
For maximum self-emptying duration
iRobotThe iRobot Roomba 104 Combo's self-emptying base holds debris for up to 75 days, requiring less frequent maintenance than the Shark's 30-day capacity.
Who Should Buy Which?
Find the right product for your needs
Buy Shark if...
Shark UR2360S Ultra Robot
The Shark UR2360S is an excellent choice for the pragmatic homeowner prioritizing robust vacuuming power and cost-effectiveness. This buyer is likely seeking a dedicated floor cleaner primarily to tackle dirt, dust, and especially pet hair, without needing an integrated mopping function. They appreciate a strong, quantifiable suction performance, like the Shark's 3000 Pa, knowing it will effectively clean both carpets and hard floors, from everyday crumbs to embedded pet dander. Budget is a significant consideration, making the $163.21 price point (as a renewed item) highly attractive for a robot with advanced LiDAR navigation and obstacle avoidance. They are also drawn to the long-term savings and convenience of a bagless self-emptying base, which holds debris for 30 days and avoids recurring purchases of disposable bags, despite needing to handle collected dust directly. This user values the self-cleaning brushroll, a specific feature that actively prevents pet hair tangles, significantly reducing manual maintenance and ensuring consistent cleaning efficacy. They are willing to accept a renewed product status for the significant value it provides in powerful, automated vacuuming, acknowledging they are giving up the versatility of a mopping function and the extended hands-off time of a bagged 75-day dock.
Buy iRobot if...
iRobot Roomba 104 2in1
The iRobot Roomba 104 Combo is ideal for the busy homeowner who desires an all-encompassing, low-maintenance floor cleaning solution. This individual values versatility and convenience above all, needing a robot that can not only vacuum effectively but also mop hard floors to maintain a pristine shine. They typically have a mix of hard flooring and carpets and appreciate the robot's intelligence, including LiDAR smart navigation and carpet detection, to automatically avoid sensitive areas during mopping cycles. While the $249.99 price tag is higher, they see it as a worthwhile investment for a new unit that combines two essential cleaning tasks into one device, saving time and effort. The standout feature for this buyer is the extensive 75-day self-emptying capacity, which means drastically reduced interaction with the robot, making their cleaning routine almost entirely hands-off. They are content with using proprietary dust bags for the self-empty dock, understanding that this contributes to the longer maintenance interval and superior containment of dust. They don't mind the unit's 14.92 lbs weight, as it won't be lifted frequently, and prioritize the dual cleaning function and extended automation over a lower initial price or a bagless system, accepting the ongoing cost of bags for unmatched convenience.
Spec Comparison
11 specs compared
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $149 | $250 |
| Rating | 4.2(798) | 4.2(27.6k) |
| Suction Power Pa | 3000 | 0 |
| Navigation Type | LiDAR | LiDAR |
| Self Emptying Base | Yes | Yes |
| App Control | Yes | Yes |
| Model Number | UR2360S | — |
| Obstacle Avoidance | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | — | 14.92 lbs |
| Height Inches | — | 4.09" |
| Carpet Detection | — | Yes |
| Mopping Function | — | Yes |
| Battery Life Mins | — | 120 |
Swipe horizontally to see all columns
Pros & Cons
Quick overview of strengths and weaknesses
Shark UR2360S Ultra
- 3000 Pa suction cleans carpet and hard floors
- 30-day capacity bagless self-empty base
- Self-cleaning brushroll prevents hair tangles
- LiDAR mapping offers precise navigation
- Product is a renewed item, not new condition
- Bagless dust bin requires handling collected debris
- Includes only one side brush, no extra spares
iRobot Roomba 104
- Empties automatically for 75 days; minimal upkeep
- 70X power-lifting suction cleans all floor types
- LiDAR mapping ensures efficient, precise navigation
- Mops hard floors and automatically avoids carpets
- Only supports 2.4 GHz WiFi network
- Unit weighs 14.92 lbs; may be heavy to lift
- Requires bag replacement for self-emptying dock
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about this comparison
Which robot offers stronger suction for deep cleaning?
The Shark UR2360S explicitly states 3000 Pa suction power, providing clear performance metrics for deep cleaning carpets and hard floors. The Roomba 104 Combo uses "70X power-lifting suction" but doesn't specify a Pa rating.
Can either robot mop my hard floors?
Yes, the iRobot Roomba 104 Combo features a dedicated mopping function for hard floors and intelligently avoids carpets when mopping. The Shark UR2360S is a vacuum-only robot.
What's the difference in their self-emptying systems?
The Shark UR2360S has a bagless self-empty base with a 30-day capacity, reducing ongoing costs. The Roomba 104 Combo self-empties for 75 days but requires proprietary dust bags.
Do both robots use advanced navigation?
Yes, both the Shark UR2360S and the iRobot Roomba 104 Combo utilize LiDAR navigation for precise mapping and efficient cleaning paths in your home.
Which robot is better suited for homes with pets?
The Shark UR2360S is highly effective for pet hair with its 3000 Pa suction and self-cleaning brushroll to prevent tangles. The Roomba also has "Intense Power-Lifting Suction" and vacuums all floors, but lacks the self-cleaning brushroll.
Is there a significant weight difference between the robots?
Yes, the iRobot Roomba 104 Combo weighs 14.92 lbs, which is relatively heavy. The Shark UR2360S does not specify its weight, but typically vacuums without mopping tend to be lighter.
Explore Other Categories
Popular comparisons across the site
Ask AI
Get instant answers about specs
Get the Deets
Ask our AI assistant
Ask Deets anything!




























