Our Verdict
Shark UR2360S Ultra Robot Vacuum Wins

While the MBYULO R101X0 offers higher 5000Pa suction and a mopping function, the Shark's LiDAR navigation provides significantly more precise and efficient coverage, combined with the unparalleled convenience of its 30-day capacity self-emptying base, all for a slightly lower price point of $163.21 compared to MBYULO's $169.99. The Shark's superior automation and navigation make it the better overall pick for most users seeking a truly hands-off cleaning experience. The MBYULO is the better pick for users prioritizing strong raw suction for deep carpet cleaning or needing integrated mopping capabilities, provided they don't mind frequent manual dustbin emptying.
Bottom Line: Shark UR2360S Ultra Robot Vacuum is the better choice. While the MBYULO R101X0 offers higher 5000Pa suction and a mopping function, the Shark's LiDAR navigation provides significantly more precise and efficient coverage, combined with the unparalleled convenience of its 30-day capacity self-emptying base, all for a slightly lower price point of $163.
In-Depth Analysis
How they compare in practice
Comparing the MBYULO R101X0 and the Shark UR2360S reveals distinct approaches to automated home cleaning, with significant implications for real-world use. The MBYULO immediately stands out with its formidable 5000Pa suction power, a substantial 67% increase over the Shark's 3000Pa. This raw power translates to more effective debris pickup, especially on carpets or for tackling stubborn dirt, ensuring a deeper vacuum clean. Additionally, the MBYULO integrates a mopping function with a smart 10mm mop lift, preventing wet carpets, a feature entirely absent from the Shark. This makes the MBYULO a true 2-in-1 solution, appealing to users who desire both vacuuming and wet cleaning from a single device. However, its camera-based navigation is generally less precise than LiDAR, potentially leading to less optimized cleaning paths and occasional missed spots in complex layouts.
The Shark UR2360S, while offering lower suction, excels in automation and navigational intelligence. Its LiDAR navigation creates highly accurate maps of your home, enabling methodical cleaning paths, precise room targeting, and efficient coverage that minimizes repetition. This translates to quicker, more thorough cleaning cycles in varied environments. The most compelling feature of the Shark is its self-emptying base, providing up to 30 days of dustbin capacity. This drastically reduces user intervention compared to the MBYULO’s small 350ml dustbin, which requires frequent manual emptying. Furthermore, the Shark’s self-cleaning brushroll is a boon for pet owners, actively preventing hair tangles, whereas the MBYULO relies on a brush-less design to avoid tangles but might struggle with embedded debris as a result.
In terms of trade-offs, the Shark offers a superior hands-off experience due to its self-empty feature and advanced navigation, making it ideal for busy individuals or pet owners prioritizing convenience. Its slightly lower price, even as a renewed item, adds to its value proposition. The MBYULO, conversely, demands more manual interaction due to its smaller dustbin and water tank but delivers higher raw suction and the added utility of mopping. Its design without a roller brush is great for preventing pet hair tangles, but its camera navigation may not be as robust in all settings. Ultimately, the choice hinges on whether maximum convenience and advanced mapping (Shark) or raw suction power and integrated mopping (MBYULO) are the higher priorities.
Key Differences
The most significant spec differences at a glance
Suction Power
67% moreAdvantages
Where each product wins
MBYULO
- Suction Power: 67% higher (5000 vs 3000)
Which to Pick for Your Situation
Concrete scenarios with a clear recommendation
For a truly hands-off, automated cleaning experience
SharkThe Shark UR2360S features a 30-day capacity self-empty base, drastically reducing the frequency of manual dustbin emptying compared to the MBYULO.
For homes requiring both vacuuming and mopping capabilities
MBYULOThe MBYULO R101X0 includes a dedicated mopping function with an automatic 10mm mop lift, which the Shark model lacks entirely.
For precise and efficient navigation in complex layouts
SharkThe Shark UR2360S utilizes advanced LiDAR navigation for accurate mapping and methodical cleaning paths, superior to camera-based systems.
For maximum suction power on carpets and stubborn debris
MBYULOWith 5000Pa suction power, the MBYULO R101X0 offers significantly stronger cleaning performance than the Shark's 3000Pa.
Who Should Buy Which?
Find the right product for your needs
Buy MBYULO if...
MBYULO Robot Vacuum and
The MBYULO MBYULO Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo is an excellent choice for individuals who prioritize comprehensive cleaning capabilities, specifically desiring both powerful vacuuming and integrated wet mopping from a single device. This buyer is likely budget-conscious, appreciating the value of a dual-function cleaner around the $170 price point, and doesn't mind a bit more hands-on maintenance. They may have a mix of hard floors and carpets, valuing the MBYULO's strong 5000Pa suction for deep carpet cleaning and the mopping function for hard surfaces. The 'no roller brush' design is a significant draw for pet owners who are tired of constantly untangling hair, even if it means sacrificing the self-emptying convenience. This user is prepared to regularly empty the 350ml dustbin and refill the water tank, seeing these minor inconveniences as a fair trade-off for the strong cleaning performance and the unique mopping feature with automatic mop lift that prevents wet carpets. They might have a smaller home where LiDAR's extreme precision isn't as critical as raw power and versatility.
Buy Shark if...
Shark UR2360S Ultra Robot
The Shark UR2360S Ultra Robot Vacuum is ideally suited for the busy individual or pet owner seeking a truly automated and low-maintenance cleaning solution. This buyer prioritizes convenience and efficiency above all else, wanting to set their robot and largely forget about it for weeks. The Shark's standout feature, the 30-day capacity self-empty base, eliminates the chore of frequent dustbin emptying, making it perfect for those with a hectic schedule or who simply dislike handling dust and debris. The advanced LiDAR navigation is another critical spec for this buyer, ensuring precise mapping, efficient cleaning paths, and thorough coverage, particularly in larger or more complex homes. Pet owners will especially appreciate the self-cleaning brushroll, which actively prevents hair tangles. While the Shark is a renewed item and has a slightly lower 3000Pa suction compared to the MBYULO, this buyer values the hands-off automation, smart navigation, and pet-friendly design over maximum raw suction or mopping capabilities, accepting the renewed condition for the enhanced features at a budget-friendly price point of $163.21.
Spec Comparison
11 specs compared
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $170 | $149 |
| Rating | 4.3(1.3k) | 4.2(798) |
| Suction Power Pa | 5000 | 3000 |
| Navigation Type | camera | LiDAR |
| Self Emptying Base | — | Yes |
| App Control | Yes | Yes |
| Model Number | R101X0 | UR2360S |
| Height Inches | 2.87" | — |
| Carpet Detection | Yes | — |
| Mopping Function | Yes | — |
| Battery Life Mins | 130 | — |
| Obstacle Avoidance | Yes | Yes |
| Dustbin Capacity ml | 350 | — |
Swipe horizontally to see all columns
Pros & Cons
Quick overview of strengths and weaknesses
MBYULO Robot Vacuum
- 5000Pa suction power cleans debris effectively.
- Automatic 10mm mop lift prevents wet carpets.
- No roller brush prevents pet hair tangles.
- App control allows scheduled remote cleaning.
- 350ml dustbin needs frequent manual emptying.
- 300ml water tank requires regular refills.
- Lacks auto-empty dock for dust disposal.
Shark UR2360S Ultra
- 3000 Pa suction cleans carpet and hard floors
- 30-day capacity bagless self-empty base
- Self-cleaning brushroll prevents hair tangles
- LiDAR mapping offers precise navigation
- Product is a renewed item, not new condition
- Bagless dust bin requires handling collected debris
- Includes only one side brush, no extra spares
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about this comparison
Which robot vacuum is better for managing pet hair?
The Shark UR2360S is superior for pet hair with its self-cleaning brushroll to prevent tangles and a 30-day self-empty base to handle collected hair, minimizing user interaction. The MBYULO's no-brush design also helps avoid tangles but lacks the auto-empty feature.
Does either robot vacuum offer a mopping function?
Yes, the MBYULO R101X0 includes a 2-in-1 mopping function with an automatic 10mm mop lift. The Shark UR2360S does not feature any mopping capabilities.
How do these robot vacuums navigate around a home?
The Shark UR2360S uses precise LiDAR navigation for efficient mapping and coverage. The MBYULO R101X0 employs camera-based navigation, which is generally less sophisticated for complex environments.
Which vacuum requires less frequent intervention for emptying?
The Shark UR2360S with its 30-day capacity self-empty base requires far less frequent attention than the MBYULO, which has a 350ml dustbin that needs regular manual emptying.
Is there a significant difference in suction power?
Yes, the MBYULO R101X0 provides 5000Pa of suction power, which is considerably higher than the Shark UR2360S's 3000Pa, offering a stronger deep cleaning capability.
Explore Other Categories
Popular comparisons across the site
Ask AI
Get instant answers about specs
Get the Deets
Ask our AI assistant
Ask Deets anything!




























