Our Verdict
Shark UR2360S Ultra Robot Vacuum Wins
Its self-emptying base and LiDAR navigation offer superior convenience and mapping. Choose MBYULO for higher 5000Pa suction and mopping.
Bottom Line: Shark UR2360S Ultra Robot Vacuum is the better choice. Its self-emptying base and LiDAR navigation offer superior convenience and mapping.
Key Differences
The most significant spec differences at a glance
Suction Power
67% moreAdvantages
Where each product wins
MBYULO
- Suction Power: 67% higher (5000 vs 3000)
Who Should Buy Which?
Find the right product for your needs
Buy MBYULO if...
MBYULO Robot Vacuum and
The MBYULO Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo is ideal for pet owners who prioritize tangle-free cleaning and powerful suction at 5000Pa. If you want a robot that also mops and don't mind manually emptying its 350ml dustbin and refilling its 300ml water tank, this ultra-slim 2.87-inch device offers great value for a cleaner home, especially if you have both carpets and hard floors needing a thorough scrub and vacuum.
Buy Shark if...
Shark UR2360S Ultra Robot
The Shark UR2360S Ultra Robot Vacuum suits those who value maximum convenience and minimal interaction. Its 30-day capacity self-empty base and precise LiDAR navigation mean you can set it and forget it for weeks, perfect for busy households. If you prioritize accurate mapping and a self-cleaning brushroll for pet hair over raw suction power (3000Pa) or a mopping function, and are comfortable with a renewed item, the Shark is an excellent hands-off choice.
Spec Comparison
11 specs compared
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $170 | $163 |
| Rating | 4.3(1.3k) | 4.2(798) |
| Suction Power Pa | 5000 | 3000 |
| Navigation Type | camera | LiDAR |
| Self Emptying Base | — | Yes |
| App Control | Yes | Yes |
| Model Number | R101X0 | UR2360S |
| Height Inches | 2.87" | — |
| Carpet Detection | Yes | — |
| Mopping Function | Yes | — |
| Battery Life Mins | 130 | — |
| Obstacle Avoidance | Yes | Yes |
| Dustbin Capacity ml | 350 | — |
Swipe horizontally to see all columns
Pros & Cons
Quick overview of strengths and weaknesses
MBYULO Robot Vacuum
- 5000Pa suction power cleans debris effectively.
- Automatic 10mm mop lift prevents wet carpets.
- No roller brush prevents pet hair tangles.
- App control allows scheduled remote cleaning.
- 350ml dustbin needs frequent manual emptying.
- 300ml water tank requires regular refills.
- Lacks auto-empty dock for dust disposal.
Shark UR2360S Ultra
- 3000 Pa suction cleans carpet and hard floors
- 30-day capacity bagless self-empty base
- Self-cleaning brushroll prevents hair tangles
- LiDAR mapping offers precise navigation
- Product is a renewed item, not new condition
- Bagless dust bin requires handling collected debris
- Includes only one side brush, no extra spares
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about this comparison
Which is better for hands-off cleaning?
The Shark UR2360S is superior for hands-off cleaning due to its 30-day capacity self-empty base, which means you don't need to manually empty the dustbin for up to a month. The MBYULO requires frequent manual emptying of its 350ml dustbin.
What's the main difference in navigation?
The Shark UR2360S uses LiDAR navigation for precise mapping and efficient cleaning paths, which is generally more accurate than the MBYULO's camera navigation. LiDAR excels in various lighting conditions and creates detailed maps of your home.
Which vacuum offers stronger suction power?
The MBYULO Robot Vacuum boasts significantly stronger suction power at 5000Pa, making it highly effective for deep cleaning debris. The Shark UR2360S has 3000Pa suction, which is still good for daily cleaning but less powerful.
Does either robot vacuum include a mopping function?
Yes, the MBYULO Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo includes a mopping function with a 300ml water tank and automatic 10mm mop lift. The Shark UR2360S Ultra Robot Vacuum does not have a mopping capability.
Related Comparisons
Similar products people compare
Lefant vs Shark
$170 vs $163
Bagotte vs MBYULO
$100 vs $170
Shark vs roborock
$163 vs $200
ILIFE vs Shark
$220 vs $163
MONSGA vs Shark
$220 vs $163
Shark vs Tikom
$163 vs $220
Shark vs Tapo
$163 vs $230
eitton vs Shark
$250 vs $163
Pureatic vs Shark
$160 vs $163
MBYULO vs Tikom
$170 vs $114
Shark vs iRobot
$163 vs $149
Shark vs eufy
$163 vs $160
Shark vs Tikom
$163 vs $114
MBYULO vs MBYULO
$170 vs $95
Shark vs eufy
$163 vs $150
Explore Other Categories
Popular comparisons across the site
Ask AI
Get instant answers about specs
Get the Deets
Ask our AI assistant
Ask Deets anything!