Our Verdict
PuroAir 240 Wins

With 640 CADR (Smoke) and 1000 sq ft coverage, it far surpasses Shark's 66.67 CADR and 104 sq ft. Choose Shark if you need a 3-in-1 device with heating and cooling functionality for a smaller room.
Bottom Line: PuroAir 240 is the better choice. With 640 CADR (Smoke) and 1000 sq ft coverage, it far surpasses Shark's 66.
Key Differences
The most significant spec differences at a glance
Cadr Smoke
860% moreCoverage Sq Ft
860% moreAdvantages
Where each product wins
PuroAir
- Cadr Smoke: 860% higher (640.0 vs 66.67)
- Coverage Sq Ft: 860% higher (1000.0 vs 104.17)
Who Should Buy Which?
Find the right product for your needs
Buy PuroAir if...
PuroAir 240 HEPA Air
If you require powerful, dedicated air purification for large residential or office spaces, the PuroAir 240 is your ideal choice. This product suits individuals prioritizing comprehensive air quality improvement across substantial areas up to 1,000 sq ft. Its high 640 CADR (Smoke) ensures rapid removal of pollutants like dust, pollen, and smoke. Buyers who need efficient, no-frills air cleaning and don't require additional heating or cooling functionalities will find its performance and price point ($159.0) highly appealing, especially for managing allergies or general indoor air quality in bigger rooms.
Buy Shark if...
Shark HC451 3-in-1 Clean
The Shark HC451 is perfect for those seeking a versatile, space-saving climate control and air purification solution for small, personal spaces like a bedroom or home office. If you value a 3-in-1 device that can purify the air, provide supplemental heat during colder months, and offer cooling fan relief in warmer weather, this product is for you. Ideal buyers prioritize multi-functionality and quiet operation in a compact unit (covering 104 sq ft) over extensive purification coverage, even at a slightly higher price point ($199.99).
Spec Comparison
5 specs compared
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $159 | $200 |
| Rating | 4.6(15.9k) | 4.3(355) |
| Cadr Smoke | 640 | 66.67 |
| Coverage Sq Ft | 1000 | 104.17 |
| Filter Type | HEPA | Nanoseal HEPA |
| Model Number | PuroAir 240 | HC451 |
| Smart Sensor | Yes | Yes |
Swipe horizontally to see all columns
Pros & Cons
Quick overview of strengths and weaknesses
PuroAir 240 HEPA
- Covers 1,000 sq ft room in one hour.
- Filters 99.9% of dust, pollen, smoke, VOCs.
- CADR (Smoke) rating is 640.
- Smart sensor adjusts fan speed automatically.
- Filter replacement costs are not specified.
- Lacks mobile app for remote control.
- No specific noise level (dB) provided.
Shark HC451 3-in-1
- Purifies air, heats rooms, and provides fan cooling.
- Nanoseal filter captures 99.98% of airborne particles.
- Clean Sense IQ auto-adjusts purification power.
- Operates quietly with dimmable lights for sleep.
- Effective purification covers only 104 sq ft.
- Low CADR of 67 for smoke limits purification speed.
- Requires periodic filter replacements, adds cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about this comparison
Which air purifier is better for a large living room?
The PuroAir 240 is significantly better for large rooms, covering up to 1,000 sq ft with a CADR (Smoke) of 640. The Shark HC451 only covers 104 sq ft and has a CADR of 66.67, making it suitable only for very small spaces.
What's the key difference in their air filtration capabilities?
The PuroAir 240 boasts a CADR (Smoke) of 640 and covers 1,000 sq ft, ensuring rapid purification. In contrast, the Shark HC451 has a CADR of 66.67 and covers just 104 sq ft, offering less powerful filtration for smaller areas.
Does one product offer more features than just air purification?
Yes, the Shark HC451 is a versatile 3-in-1 unit, functioning as an air purifier, heater, and fan. The PuroAir 240 is solely an air purifier, excelling in its core function but lacking the extra climate control features.
Which filter type is more effective at capturing particles?
The Shark HC451 uses a Nanoseal HEPA filter, capturing 99.98% of airborne particles. The PuroAir 240 uses a standard HEPA filter, removing up to 99.9% of pollutants. Both are highly effective, with the Shark having a marginally higher stated capture rate.
Explore Other Categories
Popular comparisons across the site
Ask AI
Get instant answers about specs
Get the Deets
Ask our AI assistant
Ask Deets anything!























